1802 - QI Initiative to Improve Inpatient Rehabilitation Bladder Protocol Compliance and Support Diagnosis of Urinary Retention

Friday, February 20, 2026

5:00 PM - 6:30 PM AST

Presenting Author(s)

SG

Saina Gowani, DO

Resident
Corewell Health East- Taylor
Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Co-Author(s)

JP

Juliet I. Peck, MD

Resident Physician, PGY-4
Corewell Taylor
Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States
SS

Sean Sellwood, MD

Co-author
Corewell Health
Canton, Michigan, United States
JM

Joe Mendez, MD

Chairman
Corewell Health
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
PR

Philip Roskos, PhD

Director of Research
Corewell Health
Taylor, Michigan, United States

Submitter(s)

SG

Saina Gowani, DO

Corewell Health East- Taylor
Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Objectives: Urinary retention is a common diagnosis in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF). Patients are admitted to IRF after surgeries, strokes, traumatic brain injuries, and spinal cord injuries and thus are at higher risk of urinary retention. Diagnosing and addressing urinary retention in a timely manner is imperative to reduce risk of infection and related morbidity. This project sought to improve diagnosis of urinary retention by improving compliance with the existing post-void residual (PVR) measurement protocol.

Design: Due to poor compliance and conflicting practices, the existing PVR protocol was evaluated and updated to align with current evidence-based guidelines. This initiative, with involvement of all care team members, aims to improve compliance of PVR protocol to 80% over 3 months. A training module featuring a video and quiz on proper documentation and the new protocol was designed for nursing staff. Senior resident duties were expanded to include daily oversight of PVR collection and communication of outstanding PVRs to nursing staff. To ensure team accountability, PVR completion was added to interdisciplinary team meeting documentation. An Epic Workbench Report was designed to enable regular monitoring of compliance for 3 months pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Pre-intervention compliance rates were 50.5%, 58.0%, and 60.4%, respectively. Post-intervention preliminary data shows compliance of 87% and 81% over 2 months. This initiative was effective in improving PVR protocol compliance to over 80%. This data can be expanded upon in the poster if accepted.

Conclusions: This intervention successfully improved PVR protocol implementation while spreading accountability over multiple job roles to avoid overburdening staff and ensure sustainability of the intervention. Limitations include specific patient situations, which impede application of the protocol, ie self-catheterization, CNA and RN engagement, and patient refusal. The impact of this improvement on diagnosis of urinary retention is still pending further data analysis.