Musculoskeletal
Julianne M. Atchison-Waid, n/a
Osteopathic Medical Student
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Louisiana Campus
West Monroe, Louisiana, United States
Hannah E. Kasper, BS
Medical Student
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Angelica R. Gicalone, OTD
Rehab Manager
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Kade Anderson, PT
VP of Care Delivery
RightMove Health
Burley, Idaho, United States
Hector L. Lozada, PT
Physical Therapist
RightMove Health
East Elmhurst, New York, United States
James W. Atchison, DO
Professor and Chair Dept of PM&R
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Julianne M. Atchison-Waid
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Louisiana Campus
West Monroe, Louisiana, United States
To evaluate the feasibility, completion rates, outcomes, and satisfaction of a pilot program delivering physical therapy (PT) via virtual platforms (vPT) for common musculoskeletal conditions compared with traditional in-person care.
Design: This retrospective review analyzed a clinical pilot conducted within the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) of large academic medical center in collaboration with an external PT company using Certified Orthopedic Specialists. Patients referred for PT were offered three choices: in-house outpatient PT, PT at a practice near their home, or vPT via a computer link. Those selecting vPT received enrollment instructions and a QR code upon checkout. Data were collected on referral flow, therapy completion, demographics, satisfaction, and validated outcome measures across body regions (low back, neck, upper limb, lower limb).
Results:
Of 137 referrals, 86 patients underwent initial evaluation. The treatment completion rate was 71% (61 patients), while 23% (20 patients) self-discontinued and 6% (5 patients) required medical escalation. Completion rates showed no major differences in completion by gender or age group. Among completers 96% achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) thresholds across the treated body regions, with an average of 85.2% reduction in baseline pain scores over only 5-6 visits. Patient satisfaction rate was 100% for care coordination and service recommendation likelihood.
Conclusions:
This pilot shows vPT delivery is feasible and produces substantial clinical benefit. Patients demonstrated higher-than-expected improvements in MCID, pain scores, and satisfaction levels with fewer visits. 61 of 137 (44.5%) patients completed therapy, a higher rate than previously reported for in-person PT. These findings suggest that patients actively engaging in vPT can achieve meaningful outcomes, making it an effective model for patients seeking flexible access or home-based care.